Ask any decision question — hiring, investment, legal, product, sports, real estate. 8–15 domain-specific AI agents debate. You get the weighted consensus, the strongest dissents, and a SHA-sealed verdict you can verify.
Single-LLM answers hallucinate confident wrongness. Multi-agent debate forces real reasoning across perspectives.
Hiring, Investment, Legal, Product, Sports, Real Estate, M&A — pre-built agent rosters per domain. Or define your own custom domain with your own agent personas.
Not just a verdict. You see who voted which way and why. The dissenting opinions are often the signal — they catch what the majority missed.
POST the real outcome of any verdict via API. Agents get scored. Leaderboard shows which agents you can trust on which domain over time.
Every verdict is SHA-256 hashed and ledger-recorded. Cryptographic proof of what was asked, who voted, and what was decided — court-grade audit chain.
Powered by Groq LPU inference. ~3–8 seconds end-to-end. ~$0.0003 per verdict. Build it into your workflow without watching the meter.
One POST request. JSON in, JSON out. Wire it into your CRM, hiring pipeline, deal-screening tool, fund LP memo workflow. Done in an afternoon.
Three steps. No model selection. No prompt engineering. You ask, the consensus answers.
Send a decision question + optional context. Pick a domain (hiring, investment, legal, etc.) or use a custom domain you defined.
8–15 domain-specific agents independently form opinions. Each gets full context. Each grades the others' reasoning.
Weighted consensus + confidence score + top dissents + SHA hash. Decision-ready in 3–8 seconds. Track outcomes to build agent accuracy over time.
A few of the 70 domains:
Three tiers. Free is genuinely free — no card required. Pro and Enterprise add custom domains, outcome tracking, and SLA.